Cooperly vs Shapes

Cooperly helps a growing company see why work keeps coming back to the founder: an unclear owner, a strained relationship or a handoff nobody agreed on. Choose it as a Shapes alternative when improving teamwork is the priority. Profiles, live signals, Roadmap and MCP come together at a flat team price.

30 days free. No card.

See the bottlenecks no performance report can explain.

A missed handoff can look like low performance. Cooperly finds the unclear owner, unresolved conflict or key-person dependency behind it, then gives the team an agreement to test.

  1. See the relationship behind the result

    Profiles and Fundamentals show where expectations diverge.

  2. Find where growth gets stuck

    Pulse connects a missed handoff to its pressure or dependency.

  3. Build the capability into the team

    The roadmap gives the agreement an owner and follow-up.

Shapes vs Cooperly: features and fit

Cooperly connects each signal to the people, pressure and handoff behind it, then gives the team a next step. See where Shapes is built for a different job.

The job you are buying for

Cooperly
Help an owner and their teams understand the working relationship behind a delay, conflict or repeated escalation.
Shapes
Shapes centres the purchase on employee data and HR operations. Cooperly centres it on the people and agreements behind the work that keeps getting stuck.

Understanding people

Cooperly
Coop Profiles give the team shared language for communication, decisions and working preferences.
Shapes
Shapes profiles and org charts organise employee records, reporting lines and custom data. Cooperly profiles help prepare how to work with a specific teammate.

Team feedback

Cooperly
Pulse and Fundamentals connect regular signals and a deeper team check to working context.
Shapes
Shapes supports targeted surveys, anonymous reporting and AI analysis of responses. Cooperly brings a signal beside working profiles so the next conversation has context.

Follow-through

Cooperly
Roadmap connects a suggested action to an owner and a follow-up with the people involved.
Shapes
Shapes workflows assign tasks, forms and reminders through HR processes. Cooperly makes the follow-up about a team agreement, such as who accepts the next handoff.

HR administration

Cooperly
Focus on teamwork without making leave tracking, employee documents or attendance part of the purchase.
Shapes
Shapes includes leave, attendance, documents and process automation. Cooperly can sit beside an existing HR system when those records already have a home.

AI inside the product

Cooperly
Use profiles and current team context to prepare conversations and choose the next action.
Shapes
Shapes agents handle administrative tasks, while Vibe Views creates tools and dashboards from prompts. Cooperly provides a ready team workflow for understanding friction and following up.

MCP and external AI

Cooperly
Give ChatGPT, Claude and approved MCP clients selected, read-only profiles, signals, goals and team memory.
Shapes
Shapes also supports MCP and carries user permissions into external AI. Cooperly's distinction is the working-relationship context it supplies, rather than exclusive access to MCP.

What the AI needs to know

Cooperly
How these people work, what changed recently and which agreement needs another conversation.
Shapes
Shapes demonstrates questions about headcount, compensation and attrition using live people data. Cooperly supplies context for delegation, handoffs and conversations with the team.

Pricing scope

Cooperly
Profiles, Pulse, Fundamentals, Roadmap, MCP and approved integrations are included in both team-size plans.
Shapes
Shapes uses a base plan plus separately priced apps such as Surveys. Cooperly includes the team-feedback workflow in its flat team-size price; the packages cover different jobs.

Why choose Cooperly as a Shapes alternative?

Start with the outcome you need.

A complete employee record does not settle a handoff.

Cooperly

The owner can see who is involved, how they prefer to work and what changed in the team. Use that context to discuss an unclear decision, agree an owner and return to the action on Roadmap.

Shapes

Shapes helps centralise profiles, reporting lines and people data. Cooperly adds the working conversation: what these teammates expect from one another and which agreement they should test next. Source for A complete employee record does not settle a handoff.

Choose Cooperly when a repeated escalation needs a team agreement. Choose Shapes when scattered employee records are the problem you need to solve.

Both support MCP. The useful difference is the context.

Cooperly

Ask your existing AI to help prepare a difficult handoff conversation using approved profiles and recent team signals. Read-only access keeps the decision with the people involved, while making their context easier to use.

Shapes

Shapes connects live people data to MCP clients under each user's permissions. Cooperly brings working patterns and shared agreements into that conversation. Evaluate the context your team needs, since both products can work with external AI. Source for Both support MCP. The useful difference is the context.

Choose Cooperly for conversations grounded in team relationships and recent signals. Choose Shapes when your AI needs the HR records and organisation data held there.

The onboarding checklist is complete. The work still comes back to you.

A new team lead has every document and account they need, yet colleagues still ask the founder to settle routine decisions. In Cooperly, review the team's context, discuss where authority is unclear and agree which decisions the lead now owns.

High risk

Decisions and priorities still flow through too few people.

Today2
01

Freeze one shared format for feedback and revisions

Evidence3
The team needs one cleaner comment path immediately so work stops getting reopened through scattered clarification.

Suggested owner

Priya Dawson

Why this owner

She can make the rule practical enough to use this week instead of turning it into process theatre.

Why it matters

The team needs one cleaner comment path immediately so work stops getting reopened through scattered clarification.
02

List the active work that is already in the red zone

Evidence3
The team needs one honest view of overload before it can reduce it.

Suggested owner

Serena Holt

Why this owner

She is best positioned to collect the practical signal quickly and turn it into a visible decision.

Why it matters

The team needs one honest view of overload before it can reduce it.
This week2
01

Publish the decision matrix for what escalates and what does not

Evidence3
This is the fastest way to relieve the approval bottleneck without pretending the team can decentralize everything overnight.

Suggested owner

Adrian Cole

Why this owner

He can define the new boundaries without creating confusion about the final escalation line.

Why it matters

This is the fastest way to relieve the approval bottleneck without pretending the team can decentralize everything overnight.
02

Name pilot owners for three recurring operating lanes

Evidence3
A small pilot is the lowest-risk way to prove the team can carry more middle ownership.

Suggested owner

Serena Holt

Why this owner

She can help choose lanes that are real enough to matter but contained enough to learn from quickly.

Why it matters

A small pilot is the lowest-risk way to prove the team can carry more middle ownership.
This month2
01

Run one weekly status ritual across active work

Evidence3
A visible weekly rhythm is the simplest way to raise transparency and catch blocked work earlier.

Suggested owner

Priya Dawson

Why this owner

She can keep the ritual short, legible, and close to decisions instead of status theatre.

Why it matters

A visible weekly rhythm is the simplest way to raise transparency and catch blocked work earlier.
02

Run a focused round of role and growth conversations

Evidence3
This will reduce uncertainty about ownership and help the team see how its potential is meant to be used.

Suggested owner

Adrian Cole

Why this owner

He can connect daily role clarity and longer-term growth without splitting them into separate tracks.

Why it matters

This will reduce uncertainty about ownership and help the team see how its potential is meant to be used.
This quarter2
01

Build a lightweight middle layer for recurring coordination and quality calls

Evidence3
Without this, the team will stay trapped between high standards and low scalability.

Suggested owner

Adrian Cole

Why this owner

He is the natural sponsor for turning pilot ownership into a durable operating layer.

Why it matters

Without this, the team will stay trapped between high standards and low scalability.
02

Add capacity control and early-risk escalation to the operating rhythm

Evidence3
Even better roles and cleaner feedback will not hold if overload continues to surface after the team has already absorbed the cost.

Suggested owner

Serena Holt

Why this owner

She can connect practical pacing, risk visibility, and cross-team follow-through into one usable loop.

Why it matters

Even better roles and cleaner feedback will not hold if overload continues to surface after the team has already absorbed the cost.
  1. Find the recurring escalation

    Review the signal and the people involved.

  2. Clarify decision ownership

    Prepare the conversation with working profiles.

  3. Follow the agreement

    Track the next action on the team roadmap.

Bring your own AI. Keep the team context.

Cooperly makes selected profiles, signals, goals and agreements available read-only through MCP. Use that context in ChatGPT, Claude or another approved client while Cooperly keeps the permissions.

Context Cooperly gathers

Team Pulse
Coop Profile
Fundamentals
Team memory

Cooperly

People Context Layer

Team-scopedPermissionedRead-only via MCP

The AI tools you already use

Claude

Claude chat and code access

ChatGPT

Contextual chat and commands

AI Agents via MCP

Linear, Notion, ClickUp, Asana

When to choose Cooperly

Cooperly connects working profiles, team signals and shared actions at a flat price. Compare it with Shapes when deciding between improving teamwork and running HR operations in one platform.

Choose

Cooperly

  • Your company has outgrown the founder's direct view of every team.
  • Handoffs, unclear ownership or working relationships keep delaying delivery.
  • You want profiles, team feedback and follow-up together at a published flat price.

Choose

Shapes

  • Employee records, leave, attendance and documents need a central HR system.
  • You want agents to run administrative processes such as onboarding.
  • Your HR team needs to build custom tools and dashboards from its people data.

Shapes vs Cooperly pricing

Your plan stays flat as your team grows.

One flat price for this team size. Full Cooperly access included: up to 10 people at the Teams rate, then up to 50 people across five teams at the Company rate.

30people
1011–50 people: £948/year50

Cooperly

For Companies

£948/ year · For Companies

£2.63per person / month equivalent

Shapes

Plus

from ≈£3,193/ year · base only

Calculated for 30 people. Surveys extra; subscription minimum may raise the total.

Bring the same weekly rhythm to several teams, with shared reporting and monthly reviews. Up to 5 teams, up to 50 people. MCP and approved integrations are included.

The calculator uses Shapes Plus at $12 per seat/month billed annually; Core is $8. At 30 people, Plus starts at $4,320/year before extras. Surveys is priced separately, and Shapes states that a minimum subscription applies without publishing the amount. Confirm both with Shapes for the full cost. Cooperly includes Pulse, Fundamentals, profiles, Roadmap, MCP and approved integrations in both team-size plans.

Official Shapes pricing

Cooperly gives you a known budget for the team-context workflow. The Shapes figure shows the published Plus base for your team size; add Surveys and confirm the subscription minimum to compare the full scope you need.

Prices checked .

USD estimates use the 4 September 2026 reference rate (£0.7391 per $1), rounded only for display. Taxes and optional add-ons excluded. Rate source

Questions about Cooperly and Shapes

Cooperly is an alternative when the purchase is about improving teamwork and reducing repeated escalations to the founder. It brings working profiles, team signals and next actions together. Shapes serves the wider HR-system brief; Cooperly does not replace attendance, leave or employee-document administration.

Cooperly connects the signal to working profiles and team context, then helps the people involved agree a next action. Shapes also analyses surveys and suggests actions. Try Cooperly with one recurring handoff problem and judge whether the team can turn the feedback into an agreement it revisits.

See the team workflow

Cooperly and Shapes both support MCP for approved external AI tools. Cooperly supplies selected team context read-only to tools such as ChatGPT and Claude. Shapes connects its people data using the user's existing permissions. The useful choice is which context the AI needs for your team's question.

Explore Cooperly MCP

Cooperly includes its team-feedback workflow in both team-size plans. The Shapes figure uses Plus at $12 per seat/month on annual billing, converted to GBP. It is the base-plan cost: Surveys is extra, and an unpublished subscription minimum may raise the total. Core is $8 per seat/month. Plus adds HR controls and support beyond Core.

See the pricing scope

Cooperly uses two flat team-size plans. Up to 10 people: £240/year (£20/month billed yearly). 11–50 people: £948/year (£79/month billed yearly). MCP and approved integrations are included in both team-size plans. The Teams plan covers one team; the Company plan covers up to five. Within each plan's limits, another hire does not add a seat charge.

See Cooperly plans

Cooperly can be evaluated with one team while your HR system continues handling employee administration. Use the 30-day trial to review working profiles, collect a Pulse and agree one action. No card is required. This does not imply an automatic data integration with Shapes.

Turn the next escalation into an agreement the team can own.

Try Cooperly with a real team.
30 days free. No card.